Golden datasets, calibrated LLM judges, regression gates on every PR, and live quality dashboards — built for your stack and maintained for good. Tool-agnostic: we work inside your Datadog, Langfuse, Braintrust, or LangSmith.
Golden datasets go stale. Judges drift. Model upgrades silently shift your baselines. A one-time eval build is a snapshot; quality is a subscription.
You bought the platform. Someone still has to curate the datasets, design the judges, read the traces, and keep it all alive.
Final-answer checks miss the step where it actually went wrong: the wrong tool, the bad argument, the retrieval that never happened.
We read 100+ of your real production traces and map every failure mode into a taxonomy specific to your product. Two weeks, fixed price, exec-readable report.
Golden datasets with provenance. Judges calibrated against human labels — with reported true-positive and true-negative rates. Regression gates on every PR. A dashboard your execs actually open.
Weekly runs and reports. Monthly dataset refreshes from live traffic. Quarterly re-baselines when models upgrade underneath you. Evals rot; we're the upkeep.
They should fix them — with a human on the merge button.
100+ traces, a failure taxonomy, and a prioritized roadmap in two weeks.
Mined from production, labeled by experts, stress-tested with synthetic edge cases. Versioned like code.
Custom pass/fail judges per failure mode — validated against human labels, not vibes.
Score diffs on every pull request. Quality drops block the merge.
Async judges on real traffic, alerts where you work, a dashboard worth bookmarking.
Production failures become pull requests become test cases. Automatically.
I built and ran the evals system for an industrial AI platform serving global energy companies — where a hallucinated number isn't a bad review, it's a safety problem. I bring that bar to your product.
{{ f.a }}
10 questions, instant 0–100 score, stage placement on the needs map. No email required.
{{ stageDiag }}